The Lindsay Clancy case has sparked 19th Amendment repeal calls on social media amid jury deliberations. others have called for harsh consequences if she is found not guilty While on one hand supporters have been backing the mom on trial.
The Massachusetts mother faces three counts of murder in the killings of her children Cora, 5; Dawson , 3; and Callan, 8 months.
Few early supporters lived to see final victory in 1920. Because she was in the midst of a psychotic episode that stemmed from postpartum mental illness, her defense attorneys, on the other hand, argued that she is not criminally responsible.
“Repeal the 19th Amendment today (If Lindsay Clancy walks away),” an X user wrote . “This Lindsay Clancy trial has shown us How spiteful women can be, the fact that women are willing to even defend a child killer just because they want to be ok with the “sisterhood” should alarm you. “Achieving this milestone required a lengthy and difficult struggle—victory took decades of agitation and protest, according to the National Archives. Lindsay, 35, “acted intentionally, rationally and swiftly” when she fatally strangled her three children at their Duxbury home on January 24, 2023, according to prosecutors.
They will gaslight you, they will use sign language against you and even try to call you all sort of names. But guess what, they are still wrong and they know it. Repeal the 19th,” wrote another . Journalist Sarah Fields wrote , “I cannot believe I’m saying this, but if Lindsay Clancy is found not guilty by a jury with nine women on it, I might actually be radicalized into supporting the repeal of the 19th. I vote often, and I vote consistently. But at this point, it might be a sacrifice I’m willing to make – if I thought it would even make a difference. Liberal women are destroying America. And protecting children is above all else for me. Beginning in the mid-19th century, several generations of woman suffrage supporters lectured, wrote, marched, lobbied, and practiced civil disobedience to achieve what many Americans considered a radical change of the Constitution.
